Review What Each Shot Implies
A product video can make a claim with a button, an edit or a sound even when the narration is accurate. Compare each shot with what the brief actually approves, including where the finished video will be used.
This text-only exercise uses a fictional product brief and draft shots. It does not use actual video, music or model output.
Get The Pack
Give the AI only the input file. Keep the review key and worksheet separate and retain the first response before requesting corrections.
Download comparison worksheet (.txt)
Check Three Review Boundaries
| Case | What the draft implies | What to retain or change |
|---|---|---|
| SHOT-01 | An Export button is part of the product. | Use the approved list and Status filter. Remove the invented control and export claim. |
| SHOT-02 | A processing step finishes instantly. | Remove the speed claim. If the cut is retained, label the sequence as shortened. |
| SHOT-03 | The private-review soundtrack can stay in the public release. | Use silence for this exercise. Keep the approved title card and do not carry the placeholder audio into the public version. |
Check the visual evidence, caption and audio separately. For SHOT-02, deleting the caption alone would still leave an unlabeled jump cut. A review should address what a viewer could infer from the finished sequence.
Compare A Later Run
Save the first proposal and the same brief. Compare which controls, edits and assets the next response accepts or rejects. Record missing evidence instead of turning it into a product or rights claim.
Return to the video shot list pack or choose your next check.
For a real release, inspect the actual export in the intended player and confirm any usage approvals for the exact assets and destination. The exercise checks a written plan only. For the brief itself, use the product video planning guide.