Use Cases

Check an AI Process Guide Against a Workflow

Review a fictional event signage guide for an early production step, a missing exception, and a handoff assigned to the wrong person.

Audience and review notes

For: People checking AI-drafted procedures against an approved workflow.

Check facts against original sources and remove sensitive information. Review AI output before relying on it.

Walk Through The Decisions

A numbered procedure can read well while putting a step before its approval or losing an exception. In this exercise, compare an AI-drafted event signage guide with a fictional team’s approved workflow.

Get The Pack

Give the AI only the test input. Keep the review key and worksheet separate so you can check the first answer before requesting revisions.

Download test input (.txt)

Download review key (.txt)

Download comparison worksheet (.txt)

Compare Three Steps

CaseLook forWhat to preserve
FLOW-01Work sent before the right version is approvedSend only the proof version that the event lead explicitly approved.
FLOW-02A straight path where the process has an exceptionHold when a venue detail is missing; get the corrected proof approved.
FLOW-03A handoff assigned to the wrong roleKeep pickup with the venue coordinator and close the task only after their confirmation.

Walk through the normal path and the exception separately. Check who acts and what evidence lets the process move forward.

Retest With The Same Workflow

Reuse the same workflow and draft. Note whether each run preserves the approval, exception, and handoff. For a real procedure, confirm each decision with its owner before adopting the rewrite.

Return to the process guide practice pack or choose your next check.

For another handoff check, try the reusable prompt practice to test which details the AI keeps, leaves unknown, or should omit.

From reading to a decision

Keep the workflow connected

Choose a task-first path, save candidates locally, compare the shortlist, and recheck official details before use.