Walk Through The Decisions
A numbered procedure can read well while putting a step before its approval or losing an exception. In this exercise, compare an AI-drafted event signage guide with a fictional team’s approved workflow.
Get The Pack
Give the AI only the test input. Keep the review key and worksheet separate so you can check the first answer before requesting revisions.
Download comparison worksheet (.txt)
Compare Three Steps
| Case | Look for | What to preserve |
|---|---|---|
| FLOW-01 | Work sent before the right version is approved | Send only the proof version that the event lead explicitly approved. |
| FLOW-02 | A straight path where the process has an exception | Hold when a venue detail is missing; get the corrected proof approved. |
| FLOW-03 | A handoff assigned to the wrong role | Keep pickup with the venue coordinator and close the task only after their confirmation. |
Walk through the normal path and the exception separately. Check who acts and what evidence lets the process move forward.
Retest With The Same Workflow
Reuse the same workflow and draft. Note whether each run preserves the approval, exception, and handoff. For a real procedure, confirm each decision with its owner before adopting the rewrite.
Return to the process guide practice pack or choose your next check.
For another handoff check, try the reusable prompt practice to test which details the AI keeps, leaves unknown, or should omit.