Check What Was Supposed To Stay The Same
A polished image can still be wrong for its brief. Compare the output with the approved source, including the areas that were meant to stay unchanged. A corrected blemish does not excuse a changed product detail.
This text-only exercise uses invented briefs and review notes. There are no actual images or observed model results.
Get The Pack
Give the AI only the test input. Keep the review key and worksheet separate, and retain the first answer before requesting corrections.
Download comparison worksheet (.txt)
Check Three Edit Boundaries
| Case | What the draft changed | What the brief allows |
|---|---|---|
| IMG-01 | The scuff disappeared, but the product’s blue trim became gray. | Remove only the scuff on the background. Preserve the trim. |
| IMG-02 | Glare was reduced, but the label changed from Batch 04 to Batch 40. | Reduce glare without changing any label text. |
| IMG-03 | The right margin was extended and a cable appeared. | Extend only the plain background. The source had no cable. |
Separate the edit that worked from the change that still needs correction. For IMG-02, readable lettering is not enough; compare it character by character with the approved source.
Repeat With The Same Brief
Reuse the same brief and review notes. Compare which changes each response accepted, rejected, or left unverified. Start a baseline if you do not have an earlier comparable review.
Return to the image edit practice pack or choose your next check.
For real work, inspect the source and actual export side by side, including text, borders and the intended crop. Confirm approval for the specific assets and destination. See the creative workflow guide for broader source and rights checks.